Two requirements of review govern this instance. First, we review the вЂњdistrict court’s evidentiary rulings at the summary judgment stage just for punishment of discretion.вЂќ Wright v. Farouk Sys., Inc., 701 F.3d 907, 910 (11th Cir. 2012). Under this standard, вЂњwe must affirm unless we discover that the region court has made an obvious mistake of judgment, or has applied the incorrect appropriate standard.вЂќ Knight ex rel. Kerr v. Miami-Dade Cty., 856 F.3d 795, 808 (11th Cir. 2017) (interior quote markings omitted).
2nd, we review the region court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same appropriate criteria as the region court. Information. Sys. & Networks Corp. v. City of Atlanta, 281 F.3d 1220, 1224 (11th Cir. 2002). Summary judgment is acceptable вЂњif the movant suggests that there is absolutely no genuine dispute as to your product reality together with movant is entitled to judgment as being a matter of legislation.вЂќ Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a). The burden shifts to your nonmoving celebration to exhibit that specific facts occur that raise a real problem for trial.вЂњOnce the movant acceptably supports its movementвЂќ Dietz v. (mais…)